Penerapan Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil (ASIH) terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Antenatal di Pedesaan

Authors

  • Farhati Farhati Jurusan Kebidanan Poltekkes Kemenkes Bandung
  • Nanan Sekarwana Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung
  • Farid Husin Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26630/jk.v9i3.965

Keywords:

Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil, Quality of antenatal care

Abstract

Quality of antenatal care is important to reduce the maternal mortality rate. It associated with providing antenatal care according to standards and meet the expectations or satisfaction of pregnant women. However, today’s midwifery practise still show low compliance with standards, especially related to health education and pregnant women empowerment through the use of Maternal and Child Health media books. This research aimed to analyze the effect of “Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil†implementation to antenatal care quality improvement in rural areas. This study using quasi-experimental pre-post test design with control groups conducted in West Bandung regency with sample of 61 midwive and pregnant women, using checklists and questionnaires. Univariable analysis was done through Rash modeling, bivariable analysis using numeric categorical comparative test. The results indicated that the quality of antenatal services between control and treatment groups showed significant difference with p<0,01. Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil (ASIH) implementation served to increase midwive adherence to antenatal care standards by 47.2% and satisfaction of pregnant women by 43.8%. The proportion of good quality antenatal care were 84% in treatment groups and 37% in control group. Antenatal care without using ASIH will increase midwives’ risk of noncompliance in antenatal care standards 3.93 times, pregnant women dissatisfaction 4.4 times and poor quality of antenatal care 3.93 times compared with antenatal care using ASIH.

References

Anya SE, Hydara A, Jaiteh LE. 2008. Antenatal care in The Gambia: Missed opportunity for information, education and communication BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 8(9).

Arango JFF. 2009. Workload and performance Factors Associated with multimedia Job Aids for Community Health Workers. The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston.

Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E et al. 2006. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Intern Med. 144:742-52.

Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Bandung Barat. 2015. Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Bandung Barat.

Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. 2015. Assessment of quality of antenatal care services in Nigeria: evidence from a population-based survey. Reproductive Health,12:88.

Florez JF-Arango, Iyengar MS, Dunn K, J Z. 2011. Performance factors of mobile rich media job aids for community health workers. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 18:131e7.

Hunt P, Mesquit a JBD. 2010. Reducing Maternal Mortality The Contribution of the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. The European Union and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and Universuty of Essex.

Jeffrey S, McCullough, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S. 2010. The Effect Of Health Information Technology On Quality In U.S. Hospitals. Health Affairs, 29(4).

Kaphle S, Chaturvedi S, Chaudhuri I, Krishnan R, Lesh N. 2015. Adoption and Usage of mHealth Technology on Quality and Experience of Care Provided by Frontline Workers: Observations From Rural India. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 3(2):e61.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2014. Profil Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2013. Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informasi. 2015. Buku Saku Hasil Survei Indikator TIK, Rumah Tangga dan Individu. Jakarta: Puslitbang Penyelenggaraan Pos dan Informatika Ba Litbang SDM Kominfo.

Kyeil N, Chansa C, Gabrysch S. 2012. Quality of antenatal care in Zambia: a national Assessment. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,12(151).

Liang J, Dai L, Zhu J, Li X, Zeng W, Wang H, et al. 2011. Preventable maternal mortality: Geographic/rural urban differences and associated factors from the population-based maternal mortality surveillance system in China. BMC Public Health. 11(245).

Marniyati L, Saleh I, Soebyakto Bambang B. 2016. Pelayanan Antenatal Berkualitas dalam Meningkatkan Deteksi Risiko Tinggi pada Ibu Hamil oleh Tenaga Kesehatan di Puskesmas Sako, Sosial, Sei Baung dan Sei Selincah di Kota Palembang. Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan. 3(1):355-62.

McNabb M, Chukwu E, Ojo O, Shekhar N, Gill CJ, Salami H ea. 2015. Assessment of the Quality of Antenatal Care Services Provided by Health Workers Using a Mobile Phone Decision Support Application in Northern Nigeria: A Pre/Post-Intervention Study. PLoS ONE 10(5).

Sarker M, Schmid G, Larsson E, Kirenga S, Allegri MD, Neuhann F ea. 2010. Quality of antenatal care in rural southern Tanzania: a reality check. BMC Research Notes, 3:209.

Tetui M, Ekirapa EK, Bua J, Mutebi A, Tweheyo R, Waiswa P. 2012. Quality of Antenatal care services in eastern Uganda: implications for interventions. Pan African Medical Journal, 13(27).

Yeoh PL, Hornetz K, Ahmad Shauki NI, Dahlui M. 2015. Assessing the Extent of Adherence to the Recommended Antenatal Care Content in Malaysia: Room for Improvement. Plos One, 10(2).

Downloads

Published

30-12-2018