Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for Jurnal Kesehatan?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.


Author Guidelines

1. General Instructions

Jurnal Kesehatan (JK) published a study that discusses the science of nursing, midwifery, dental health, pharmacy, environmental health, nutrition, health analysts, occupational health, public health and science technology. In particular, studies that identify health problems and provide possible solutions of a population. 

A commitment of editors, reviewers and editorial team of Jurnal Kesehatan is to review it quickly, consistently and efficiently. Manuscript received will be reviewed by experts in a blind review. Experience formatting and copying manuscripts and posted online as an article after being received. The Final version is published in print and optimized for search engine, indexed in the database DOAJ, Sinta, Google Scholar, CrossRef, Portal Garuda, and ISDJ.

Because of pages that can be issued each year is limited, conformity is an important consideration in the review process. To facilitate the review, the Editor-in-Chief see all the manuscripts submitted and independently, to decide whether an appropriate text to be examined by a member of the editorial board and or Partner Bebestari JK. The manuscript beyond the scope of JK returned without delay a full review. Authors can contact the Editor in Chief in advance to inquire about the possibility of the suitability of their research topics for review.
Submission and questions are encouraged.

The style and format of manuscripts (template) can be downloaded here.

2. Type of Manuscripts

Articles Research/ Research Article

Research reports are of interest to the scientific community in the field of health will be published as a research article. A manuscript has been a well-described hypothesis, measurable results and has not been previously explored.


Community scientists in the field of health can issue a review. Review contains the latest review of the science of nursing, midwifery, dental health, pharmacy, environmental health, nutrition, health analysts, occupational health, public health and science technology. In addition, a review is published as a guide for instructors in the field of health. Authors are encouraged to elaborate on the background and history of previous research and quote-review previously published reviews. Generally, the description in the review contains the latest information (last few years).
A comprehensive review and comment will be published as "Critical Reviews". Critical reviews are intended to discuss the literature that has been published, it is not intended to present a new review, reanalysis of data or further analysis. JK will review the appropriate review as research articles. Critical reviews can be initiated by the Editor-in-Chief or the author. To review initiated by the author, before writing a review, the authors suggested outline handed to the review's editor, so that it complies with JK. The scope of review can be determined prior to submission. This article is generally limited to five printed pages.

3. Submission Procedure

The submission to JK made online at

Users need to register when accessing the system for the first time. Detailed instructions and help files available online, if you have trouble, users can call a contact listed on

or e-mail to

JK will follow up the manuscript that has been filed with precast posted on the server. The manuscript will undergo a review by a peer-review, are as strict as manuscripts posted on a precast server. Before submitting your manuscript, make sure your manuscript has been formatted according to the template. 

4. Manuscript File Format

FileWord (.doc or .docx) is a file format for the manuscript to be submitted. It is necessary to facilitate the process of revision of the manuscript. The font used is a standard font, Times New Roman


5. Manuscript Preparation

Jurnal Kesehatan is limited to the number of pages that can be published, and the length of the article into consideration in the editorial process. A manuscript is recommended no more than 6000 words (from the introduction to the discussion. The number of words does not include the title, abstract, acknowledgments, references, captions or table. Authors are encouraged to explain clearly and concisely. Manuscript certainly one space, not recommended page break (continuous file). The manuscripts are not in accordance with the terms may be returned to the author. 

Manuscript submitted contain:


ad. a. TITLE

The title is structured as a declarative statement and focused on the results presented in the manuscript. Punctuation "semicolon (;)" not recommended. The names of all authors without a degree (first name, middle name, last name) is clearly explained, and the address of departments and institutions. All the author's last name must be exactly as it should appear on Google Scholar. Please consider this carefully, especially for writers with names that include hyphens and prefix. JK will not replace the file to correct the name of the author after publishing. 


Abstract prepared correctly and informative in order to facilitate the process of review by the journal's editor. Abstract background containing the results and conclusions of the methods described clearly and concisely. The background to explain the context of the research, the exact purpose, specific hypotheses to be tested. The method describes the study design, the identification of specific methods and procedures. The results showed that the most important results of the study, including the main data and the statistical analysis. The main conclusion in the form summary of the results of research (avoid generalization). Below the abstract, provide and identify keywords or short phrases, including a group of subjects, which will improve the ability to find the manuscript, should not be used adjectives. Please note that during delivery of the manuscript, the author will be asked to provide keywords to assist editors in determining the reviewers appropriate for manuscripts. Keywords for search reviewer is the most fundamental word in the manuscript and may differ from the keyword list for publication.


Explain clearly the background research conducted and its specific objectives, should not be a thorough review of the literature. State the specific purpose or hypothesis of this study.

ad. d. METHOD

The method describes the study design, materials, and equipment, with a model number or a catalog, if necessary. Explain kit, analysis, and commercial laboratories are used. Quote the reference of the methods listed if possible and give a brief explanation if the modification. Research using humans and animals as objects. The study report must include a statement that the protocol was approved by an ethics committee. Documents can be uploaded as a statement of additional files. Objects such as animal research are necessary to explain how the animals are removed, control and treatment groups or probands experimental animals. Information on age, weight, sex, race, described for the human object, and a description of sex or strain to the experimental animals, include suppliers of experimental animals.

The method also describes the statistical tests used and the degree of probability (p) indicated where differences were considered significant. If the data presented in the text, indicate what they represent (ie., Mean ± SEM). Indicate whether the data is transformed prior to analysis. Define statistical computer program that is used. The results of the analysis are shown in the data tables and figures. Letters and symbols to show a significant difference, and footnotes tables and figures. Provide statistical variability according to the estimated error variance (SD or SEM) of the mean of the group. Standard ANOVA methodology assumes homogeneous variance. If the error variance tested and found heterogeneous, change the data before ANOVA, or use nonparametric tests. For a discussion of the calculation of the variability and procedures arch curves. If the reported P values not significant, use only 2 digits past the decimal (for example, P = 0.15). Serve significant P values up to a maximum of 4 decimal places (for example, P<0.0001); Useless acceptable. The coefficient is now a maximum of 2 decimals (eg. R = 0.87, R2 = 0.16, ff.).

ad. e. RESULTS

The results described without repeating the methodology, introduction, or content on the discussion. Duplication of data from tables or figures in the text avoided.
Results using the unit, it is necessary to metric units (eg, meters, kilograms, and L for height, weight, and volume), such as Celsius (° C). For data reporting, the use of SI units (le System Internationale d'Unites) (17) preferred (ie., Mmol / L, g / L), but not mandatory. Conventional units such as mg / dL mg / mL can be accepted, using L, instead of l, for a liter. Use the unit for the analytes/compounds are equally consistently throughout the manuscript. Instinctively puts a replacement unit in the text or give a conversion factor in a footnote in a table or legend acceptable image. The unit should not be pluralized (ie., Wk and not wks) or followed by a period.

A useful site is:

SI conversions:

SI conversions:

Conversion clinical SI:

While the figures presented to a variable must be properly and consistently. Use no more than three significant figures (less, if appropriate) or justification for higher accuracy.
Tables or figures, adapted or quoted from another source must include the source in a footnote in a table or legend images. Each table should have a clear title but concise. Information about the method or material explanations can be included in a footnote to the table, but the repetition of the methodology should be minimized. Clearly indicate the unit of measure after the variables in line, above the first value in each column, or centered on all columns of the units where applicable. Statistics show variability (ie., SD, combined SEM) and the significance of the difference between data. Eliminate internal horizontal and vertical rules before submitting your table. 


The discussion explains the importance of the findings, the literature related to putting into context. Explanation of the discussion should be clear and concise.
ad. g. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The main conclusion is the result of research (avoid generalization), and refer to the description in the discussion, and answer the research objectives. The conclusions are described in the form of points or narrative, logical and precise.


Technical assistance and advice can be described at the end of the text. Then the names of individuals that are included in this section, the author is responsible for the written consent of every person who communicates personally or recognized by the individual in the text.


There is no limit to the number of quotations permitted; citing the latest literature comprehensively. Note that there should be no line numbers in line with the title "References" or along the References section. Reference is written according to the rules APA Style. All references contained in the library panel should be referred to in the text by stating the author's name and year of publication reference in use. If there are more than two authors then use "et al" after the name of the first author. Format: (name of the author, year of publication), (name of the first author and the author's name 2, year of publication), (name of first author et al, year of publication).


Journal articles

Author 1, Author 2, Author 3. Publish year. The title of the journal. Name Journal. Volume: page.

AT Wahyudi, Takeyama H, Okamura Y, Fukuda Y, Matsunaga T. 2003. The characterization of aldehyde ferredoxin oxidoreductase-defective mutant gene in Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1.Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,303: 223-229.

Author 1, Author 2. Year of published. Book title. Place of publication: Name of publisher. 
Schmidt-Nielsen K. 2000. Animal Physiology: Adaptation andEnvironment. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr.

Chapter In Book

Author 1, Author 2. Publish year. Chapter Titles: Sub Title. In: Name of editor (eds). Book Title. Place of publication: Publisher Name. Page.
Weir BS. 1996. Intraspecific differentiation. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (eds). Molecular Systematics.2nd ed. Massachusetts: Sinauer Assc. p 385-405.

Thesis or Dissertation

author name. Year. Title. [Thesis/Dissertation]. Places University: Name University.
Widayanti KA. 2006. Color perception of L4M5 Macaca fascicularis female gene carriers. [Thesis]. Bogor. Bogor Agricultural Univ. 



Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  1. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  2. The submission file is in Open Office, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
  3. Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  4. The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  5. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.


Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Publication: 150000.00 (IDR)
If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs.

If you do not have funds to pay such fees, you will have an opportunity to waive each fee. We do not want fees to prevent the publication of worthy work.