Analisis Perbedaan Variasi Derajat Keasaman terhadap Tingkat Spesifisitas Metode Kastle-Meyer dalam Pendeteksian Darah

Authors

  • Asep Sabolakna UPT Pelatihan Kesehatan Provinsi Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • Kimberly Angelia Jurusan Analis Kesehatan, Politeknik Kesehatan Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26630/jk.v13i2.3038

Keywords:

Blood, Degree of acidity, Kastle-Meyer, Specificity.

Abstract

Blood is evidence of a crime that can be damaged by humans and environmental factors. One of the contaminants that have the potential to affect the specificity of the Kastle-Meyer method in detecting blood is the variation in the degree of acidity (pH). Specificity analysis of the Kastle-Meyer method is needed to determine the ability of the Kastle-Meyer method to detect blood in the presence of other components/contaminants that may be present in a sample. The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in the addition of an acidic solution with a pH of 1.2-8.4 on the specificity of blood detection using the Kastle-Meyer method. The research was conducted in the form of pre-experimental research with a static-group comparison design. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. Blood samples that have been added to an acid solution with a certain pH (pH 1,2; 2.4; 3.6; 4.8; 6; and 7.2) were then tested using the Kastle-Meyer method. The principle of the Kastle-Meyer method is based on the activity of the peroxidase enzyme present in hemoglobin in the blood. The results showed the specificity of the Kastle-Meyer method on blood samples with acid solution contaminants with a pH of 1.2; 2,4; 3,6; 4.8; 6.0; 7.2; and 8.4 respectively at 70%, 70%, 90%, 60%, 60%, 90%, 80%. The results of data analysis from the Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significance p-value 0.269 > 0.05, so it can be concluded that there is no difference in the specificity of the Kastle-Meyer method in detecting blood in the addition of acid solutions with different acidity degrees.

References

Almatsier, S. (2010). Prinsip Dasar Ilmu Gizi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Arsyadi. (2014). Fungsi dan Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum dalam Perkara Pidana. Summer, Vol.2, No.2.

BMKG. (2020). Informasi Kimia Air Hujan. https://www.bmkg.go.id/kualitas-udara/informasi-kimia-air-hujan.bmkg

BPS. (2018). Statistik Kriminal 2018. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2018/12/26/89c06f465f944f3be39006a1/statistik-kriminal-2018.html

Harmita. (2004). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Validasi Metode Dan Cara Perhitungannya. Majalah Ilmu Kefarmasian, 1(3), 117-135. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/mik/vol1/iss3/1/

Harmono, H. D. (2020). Validasi Metode Analisis Logam Merkuri ( Hg ) Terlarut pada Air Permukaan dengan Automatic Mercury Analyzer. Indonesian Journal Of Laboratory, 2(3), 11–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/ijl.v2i3.57047

Hove, M., van Hille, R. P., & Lewis, A. E. (2007). Mechanisms of formation of iron precipitates from ferrous solutions at high and low pH. Chemical Engineering Science, 63(6), 1626–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.11.016

Johnston, E., Ames, C.E., Dagnall, K.E., Foster, J., & Daniel, B. E. (2008). Comparison of presumptive blood test kits including hexagon OBTI. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(3), 687-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00727.x

Kiun, S. (2013). Kimia X: Konsep Inti, Contoh Soal, dan Pembahasan. Depok: Herya Media.

Muhammad, E. P., Murni, A. W., Sulastri, D., & Miro, S. (2016). Hubungan Derajat Keasaman Cairan Lambung dengan Derajat Dispepsia pada Pasien Dispepsia Fungsional. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.25077/jka.v5i2.524

Nurhayati, I., Riyani, A., Kurnaeni, N., Wiryanti, W., Rinaldi, S., & Feisal. (2019). Validasi Metode GOD-PAP Pada Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah Dengan Pemakaian Setengah Volume Reagen Dan Sampel. Jurnal Riset Kesehatan, 11(1), 322–336. https://doi.org/https://juriskes.com/index.php/jrk/article/view/792

Rohman, A. (2014). Validasi dan Penjaminan Mutu Metode Analisis Kimia. Yogyakarta: UMG PRESS.

Spalding RP. (2005). Presumptive Testing and Species Determination in Blood and Bloodstains. James SH, Kish PE, Sutton TP. Principles of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (USA), pp. 349-368.

Sutton, R., Trueman, K., & Moran, C. (2017). Crime Scene Management: Scene Specific Method (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Tobe, S. S., Watson, N., & Daéid, N. N. (2007). Evaluation of six presumptive tests for blood, their specificity, sensitivity, and effect on high molecular-weight DNA. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(1), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00324.x

Webb, J. L., Creamer, J. I., & Quickenden, T. I. (2006). A comparison of the presumptive luminol test for blood with four non-chemiluminescent forensic techniques. Luminescence, 21(4), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.908

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

07-09-2022

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Kesehatan

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.