Efek Homogenisasi Spesimen Darah Metode Inversi Terhadap Nilai Hematokrit

Authors

  • Noor Fadillah Program Studi DIV Teknologi Laboratorium Medik Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Muhammad Ardi Afriansyah Program Studi DIV Teknologi Laboratorium Medik Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Andri Sukeksi Program Studi DIV Teknologi Laboratorium Medik Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Budi Santosa Program Studi Magister Ilmu Laboratorium Klinis Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26630/jak.v12i1.3714

Keywords:

Homogenization, inversion method, hematocrit

Abstract

Laboratory examination consists of three stages, namely pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytic. The biggest error occurred in the pre-analytical stage, which was around 61%. Homogenization including the pre-analytical stage is the process of mixing blood and anticoagulants which are included in the pre-analytical stage. Homogenization has two ways namely manual and automatic. Inadequate homogenization can cause clots or rupture of erythrocytes/lysis and shrinkage of erythrocytes, leading to a falsely low hematocrit value. The study aimed to find out and analyze differences in hematocrit values by homogenizing the inversion method 2, 4, and 10 times. This type of research is observational analytic. The research was carried out in June - August 2021 at the Clinical Laboratory of Muhammadiyah University of Palangkaraya. The research sample consisted of 9 EDTA blood from 9 people according to the inclusion criteria. All samples were examined for hematocrit using a Hematology Analyzer Sysmex XP-300. The results showed that the average hematocrit value in 2 times inversion homogenization was 38.40%, 4 times homogenization was 38.78%, and 10 times homogenization was 39.14%. The conclusion of this study was that there was no significant effect of the inversion homogenization technique 2, 4, and 10 times on the hematocrit value (p=0.584 > 0.05).

References

Alma, B., Pra, M. N.-, & Mariadi, D. (n.d.). Perbedan Jumlah Trombosit Yang Dihomogenisasi Sekunder Manual Teknik Inversi 10 Kali Dengan Homogenisasi Otomatis Teknik Rolling 1 Menit Dan 2 Menit.

Ch, L. S., Haiti, M., & Ramadani, U. R. (2022). Lidwina Septie Ch, dkk Homogenisasi Sekunder 4, 8 kali dan Tanpa Homogenisasi Sekunder Pada pemeriksaan Trombosit. Jurnal Kesehatan Dan Pembangunan, 12(24).

Fay, D. L. (2020). Perbedaan Kadar Hematokrit Berdasarkan Homogenisasi Manual Dan Menggunakan Alat Blood Roller Mixer. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. http://repository.unimus.ac.id/4465/

Haiti, M., Sinaga, H., & Ramadani, U. R. (2021). Jumlah Eritrosit Dengan Teknik Homogenisasi Sekunder Inversi 5 Kali Dan 8 Kali. Jurnal Masker Medika, 9(2), 499–503.

Hartina, H., Garini, A., & Tarmizi, M. I. (2019). Perbandingan Teknik Homogenisasi Darah Edta Dengan Teknik Inversi Dan Teknik Angka Delapan Terhadap Jumlah Trombosit. JPP (Jurnal Kesehatan Poltekkes Palembang), 13(2), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.36086/jpp.v13i2.239

Hidayah, S. C. (2020). Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Jumlah Trombosit Sampel Yang Dihomogenkan Dengan Blood Roller Mixer Selama 1, 5 Dan 10 Menit Kecepatan 35 Rpm. Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Jumlah Trombosit Sampel Yang Dihomogenkan Dengan Blood Roller Mixer Selama 1, 5 Dan 10 Menit Kecepatan 35 Rpm. http://repository.unimus.ac.id/id/eprint/4503

Inversi, S., & Dan, K. (2021). 462-Article Text-963-1-10-20220201. 9, 499–503.

Khotimah, E., & Sun, N. N. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Pada Proses Pra Analitik Dan Analitik Terhadap Sampel Serum Pasien Di Rsud Budhi Asih. Jurnal Medika Hutama, 03(04), 3021–3031.

Meilanie, A. D. R. (2019). Different of Hematocrit Value Microhematocrit Methods and Automatic Methods in Dengue Hemorrhagic Patients With Hemoconcentration. Journal of Vocational Health Studies, 3(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.20473/jvhs.v3.i2.2019.67-71

Menggunakan, H., Dan, E., Pada, S., Stikes, M., & Jombang, I. (2016). Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Mikro Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Mikro.

Nugraha, G., & Badrawi, I. (2018). Pedoman Teknik Pemeriksaan Laboratorium Klinik. Trans Info Media, 76. www.transinfotim.blogspot.com

Putra, G., Sayekti, & Maharani, S. (2017). Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Mikro Hematokrit Menggunakan Edta 5% Dan 10%. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. http://digilib.stikesicme-jbg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jic/article/view/351/280

Rosita, A., Mushawwir, A., & Latipudin, D. (2015). Status Hematologis (eritrosit, hematokrit, dan hemoglobin) Ayam Petelur Fase Layer Pada Temperature Humidity I ndex Yang Berbeda. Student Journals, 4(1), 1–10.

Sitanggang, A. B., Assa’adiyah, A. L., & Syah, D. (2019). Evaluasi Derajat Homogenisasi (Homodegree) dan Korelasinya dengan Ukuran Partikel Lemak Susu Sterilisasi Komersil. Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality, 6(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmpi.2019.6.24

Susilowati, N. P., Afriansyah, M. A., & Ethica, S. N. (2022). Potential Application of HSFI-8 Crude Protease as Meat Tenderizer and Anticoagulant Agent. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 05(11), 2965–2970. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v5-i11-01

Syuhada, S., Aditya, A., & Candrawijaya, I. (2020). Perbedaan Hematokrit Darah Segar dan Darah Simpan (30 Hari) DI UTD RSAM Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Sandi Husada, 12(2), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.35816/jiskh.v12i2.379

Downloads

Published

2023-06-26